Task: [Your request]
After formulating an initial response:
1. Evaluate your answer according to these criteria:
- Factual accuracy
- Completeness
- Clarity and comprehensibility
- Practical applicability
2. Identify areas for improvement
3. Create a revised, optimized version
4. Present only the final, improved answer
Before answering, check:
- Fairness: Is the answer balanced and unbiased?
- Harm: Could the information be misused?
- Transparency: Are uncertainties clearly marked?
- Benefit: Does the answer maximize value for the user?
Adjust your response accordingly.
Step 1: Analyze this request and identify 3 sub-questions
that need to be answered.
Step 2: For each sub-question:
- Formulate it precisely
- Answer it thoroughly
- Identify other relevant aspects
Step 3: Synthesize all partial answers into a coherent
overall response.
Step 4: If important new questions have emerged, repeat
the process once.
Topic: [Your topic]
1. Choose the most important aspect
2. Explore it to complete depth
3. Document all insights
4. Return and choose the next aspect
5. Repeat until all aspects are covered
6. Create an integrated summary
Proposed solution: [Your idea]
Test this solution against:
1. Edge cases
2. Scaling problems
3. Unforeseen side effects
4. Resource constraints
5. Human factors
For each identified problem: Suggest adjustments
Think outside all conventional boundaries:
1. Initially ignore all practical constraints
2. Combine concepts from completely different domains
3. Question fundamental assumptions
4. Develop 5 radically innovative approaches
5. Only then: Adapt the most promising for reality
Elements: [A, B, C]
Examine:
1. A + B: What synergies emerge?
2. B + C: What new possibilities?
3. A + C: What unexpected connections?
4. A + B + C: What emergent properties?
5. Identify the synergy maximum
Problem in Domain A: [Description]
1. Abstract the core problem
2. Find analogous problems in Domains B, C, D
3. How were they solved there?
4. Transfer solution principles back to Domain A
5. Adapt for specific context
Complex concept: [Your concept]
1. Find metaphors from:
- Nature (biological systems)
- Technology (machines, software)
- Society (social structures)
- Art (music, painting)
2. For each metaphor:
- What are the parallels?
- What insights does it offer?
- Where are the limits?
3. Synthesize a new, powerful explanation
Question: [Your question]
Answer structure:
1. Most likely answer (70-90% confidence)
2. Alternative scenarios (20-30% confidence)
3. Unlikely but possible cases (5-10%)
4. Black Swan events (<1% but high impact)
For each scenario: Justification and implications
Parameters for this response:
- Technical level: [1-10]
- Example density: [low/medium/high]
- Cultural context: [specify]
- Time horizon: [short/medium/long-term]
- Risk tolerance: [conservative/balanced/progressive]
Generate tailored response based on these parameters.
Original prompt: [Your prompt]
1. Analyze strengths and weaknesses
2. Generate 3 improved versions:
- Version A: Clearer structure
- Version B: More precise requirements
- Version C: Better examples
3. Test each version
4. Combine the best elements
5. Present optimal prompt
After each response evaluate:
- Was the answer too detailed/superficial?
- Was the desired style achieved?
- Were there misunderstandings?
Adjust the next prompt accordingly:
- For too little detail: "Explain in more detail..."
- For wrong style: "In the style of..."
- For misunderstandings: "To clarify..."